It is important to bring up the subject of labor inspection
After discussing the macron and rebsaman statutes, the IRP, and the Labour Court, it is important to bring up the subject of labor inspection. Although this administration is notorious for its authoritarian role, it nonetheless performs other, less well-known, functions. Recent changes have also disrupted its operations. Let's investigate this further.
It's time for a new regime.
The labor inspection department has a bad reputation, similar to that of the tax agency. Every time I call one of these organizations or others, I'm listened to and informed by an attentive and responsive representative. The present government may interfere in 1.8 million private sector enterprises, which employ 18 million people, with 781 inspectors and 1320 controllers. One agent is employed by a total of 856 firms. Medical work inspectors and preventative engineers may assist the agent in charge of control in their efforts.
In addition, the government employs 522 people in the field of public relations (employees, IRPs, employers). To put it another way, Direct's 5700+ agents are dispersed throughout many regional offices. Note that quality inspections are not limited to the company's premises, but also to building sites, fishing boats, and cruise ships (oceans and rivers). The authority of quality inspection institutions is restricted in privatized public organizations (La Poste, France t é L é com, SNCF, RATP) to personnel with private identity, occupational health and safety. Please refer to "a distinct talent in the public sector" on page 25 of the report for further information.
Finally, we don't feel that the inspector's job is harmful... However, in 2004, two agents were killed by a farmer while on a control visit to the Dordogne River in the south of France.
What is your purpose, exactly?
Legislative Texts (laws, decrees), regulations (decrees, orders, whether they have been incorporated into the labor code), provisions of the public health code, rural and marine fisheries regulations, maritime labor regulations, environmental regulations, social security regulations, collective agreements, etc. There were nearly 294000 interventions by the labor inspection department in 2013, including 167500 controlled visits; Nearly 235000 follow-up actions, such as 183500 written opinions and site-related decisions; 5375 formal notices; 6374 crime reports submitted to the prosecutors and governors; and 6500 referral procedures; (seized by judges to implement measures or obligations). To find out more information.
There are a variety of topics that could be included in information made available to the public about the employment relationship, such as personal and collective relations, working conditions and equipment, employment contract duration, organizational structure and duration of time spent at a job, and social dialogue about pay and benefits. Work... There is a public phone line available, but meetings in person are also possible (free and confidential). The labor inspector must offer approval for administrative activities unrelated to the inspection when the employer seeks to terminate protected workers or wants to create individualized working hours. the visit. the visit. In addition, he reads the company's internal rules, attends chsct meetings, and gets the agenda (so he may go there if the subject under discussion is sensitive).
In comparison to other nations, the French government has greater authority. The only thing they have in common is that they all focus on occupational health and safety interventions.
What's in store for us in the future?
The independence of labor inspectors is guaranteed under ILO agreements 81, 129, and 178, which are all enforced by the country's national labor inspection commission (CNIT). Former labor ministers Michel Sabin and Franç OIS rebsamen have been reforming labor inspection since 2012 in an effort to "strengthen" it in light of today's complicated issues. Controlling big hazards and preventing unlawful activity are two of the top priorities for certain controllers, and an intermediate area level has been developed (the existing parts are grouped into "control units"). Each unit has a manager in charge of its operations (experienced inspector or deputy director). To counteract unlawful work and other potential hazards, the team keeps a close eye on the area. At the national level, a group has been created to monitor, support, and regulate national management activities.
Simply said, it is easy to see why further layers have been added to transform this rather basic government into a century... On January 1, 2015, the reform went into force. For enterprises with less than 50 workers, the reform calls for the progressive phaseout of controllers (class B agents) in favor of inspectors (class A agents) (Class A agents of companies with more than 50 employees). In a corporation with less than 50 people, who will be in charge? What's the matter? One thousand inspectors who will retire in the next three years have no intentions to recruit, according to the Confederacy.
"Control unit" officials will be granted hierarchical power and the authority to direct the acts of agents in accordance with the Department's goals, undermining their autonomy. Aside from lowering agents by 10% to 15%, the removal of the Cu's head from these employees will also decrease the number of staff committed to control by 10% to 15%.
Did you manage to put the overzealous inspector on the back foot?
When reading about the t é fal event in Anasi, there is a question that must be posed. On May 31, 2013, Laura Tefala was called before annahi criminal court by corporate specialists to halt these practices, and he was sentenced to two years in prison in 2015. As a result of his efforts, Inspector-General Philippe Dumont lived to see another day and was eventually reassigned in the fall of 2014.
"It's clear that this trial is a political one." This is a test for our professional and labor inspection agencies. For years, successive governments have dissolved it, and it has to fight the incessant assaults of MEDEF and employers by requesting its agents," the trade union thought. On Tefal's side, prosecutor É ric mailaud wasn't surprised and remarked that the inspectors "disseminated" fraudulent paperwork to all unions, which he found inappropriate. He was not alone. According to him, even if the investigation is still ongoing, this might serve as a wake-up call for an institution with a reputation for high moral standards. "It's a chance to clean the home."
The trial finished on October 16 with the penalty of a suspended fine of 3500 euros, a fine with a criminal record, and a legal cost of 2500 euros for the inspector and the computer expert (former employee). 'I believe I simply did my job', said the inspector, who was astonished by the verdict, according to a source who spoke to the media.
- 14 Forums
- 37.5 K Topics
- 38.7 K Posts
- 8 Online
- 91.4 K Members